Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Kloc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Kloc[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the criteria of notability for a creative professional https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals MurielMary (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject of this article does not meet criteria for WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. No significant coverage in RS - the references contain a handful of articles that simply mention his name, and two interviews (primary sources). No important collections, exhibitions or awards/honors. Netherzone (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. There is some minor coverage, mostly in LA Mag, but it's not enough for GNG.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "local legend" says it all. No solo exhibits in major art scenes/galleries/museums. Bearian (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.